Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The note addresses whether limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be measured solely by section 144C or with reference to section 153; applying the reasoning of prior precedents it concludes the limitation period is to be determined read with section 153, making the final assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) for AY 2020-21 time barred. The operative effect is quashing of that final assessment order. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the Supreme Court Larger Bench alters the law on this limitation issue.
The note addresses whether limitation for passing a final assessment under section 144C(13) must be measured solely by section 144C or with reference to section 153; applying the reasoning of prior precedents it concludes the limitation period is to be determined read with section 153, making the final assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) for AY 2020-21 time barred. The operative effect is quashing of that final assessment order. Parties are granted liberty to revive the appeal on merits if the Supreme Court Larger Bench alters the law on this limitation issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
