Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Issue concerned eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IC where assessee manufactured some items listed in the Fourteenth Schedule but not those in the Thirteenth Schedule. Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that manufacture of Fourteenth Schedule items alone invoked Section 80-IC(2)(b); instead eligibility was determined by location in a notified eligible area and commencement of production within the specified period. Result: assessee entitled to benefit under Section 80-IC(2)(a)(ii) on satisfying location and commencement criteria, not merely by producing certain Fourteenth Schedule goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
