Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Estimation of profit element in non-genuine purchases: the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) mechanically followed an earlier ITAT direction limiting disallowance without independently verifying factual parity between years or the effect of later binding precedents, and that subsequent authority criticises fixed-rate profit estimates where the assessee fails to prove genuineness. The impugned restriction was set aside and the matter remitted to the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate after affording the assessee a hearing, to apply relevant binding precedents and record a reasoned finding. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and remand ordered.
Estimation of profit element in non-genuine purchases: the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) mechanically followed an earlier ITAT direction limiting disallowance without independently verifying factual parity between years or the effect of later binding precedents, and that subsequent authority criticises fixed-rate profit estimates where the assessee fails to prove genuineness. The impugned restriction was set aside and the matter remitted to the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate after affording the assessee a hearing, to apply relevant binding precedents and record a reasoned finding. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and remand ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.