Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Estimation of profit element in non-genuine purchases: the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) mechanically followed an earlier ITAT direction limiting disallowance without independently verifying factual parity between years or the effect of later binding precedents, and that subsequent authority criticises fixed-rate profit estimates where the assessee fails to prove genuineness. The impugned restriction was set aside and the matter remitted to the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate after affording the assessee a hearing, to apply relevant binding precedents and record a reasoned finding. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and remand ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.