Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Successive bail was denied because no substantial change in circumstances was demonstrated; the investigation is complete and both charge sheet and supplementary charge sheet have been filed, with material prima facie implicating the applicant for impersonation and conspiracy to extract illegal gratification. Electronic evidence-CCTV placing the applicant at the negotiation site, voice samples, and recorded telephone conversations-supports the prosecution case, and witness identification further corroborates involvement. The applicant's alleged evasion of process, reluctance to provide voice samples, and non-cooperation during investigation were held as factors weighing against bail, leading to rejection of the second bail application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.