Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer's own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.
Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer's own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
