<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Escapement Threshold: escaped income below statutory monetary threshold, so reassessment jurisdiction invalid and appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96895</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer&#039;s own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and &quot;income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment&quot; refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Escapement Threshold: escaped income below statutory monetary threshold, so reassessment jurisdiction invalid and appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96895</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147/148 was quashed because applying the Assessing Officer&#039;s own gross profit rate (13.85%) produced alleged escaped income of Rs.48,09,503, below the statutory monetary threshold of Rs.50,00,000 under section 149(1)(b), and &quot;income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment&quot; refers to real income, not gross transaction value. On merits, the assessee produced primary documents and bank payment evidence which AO did not independently test; books were not rejected under section 145(3), and a separate addition would duplicate profit already reflected in returned income. Appeal allowed by ITAT.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:29:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>