Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalty.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during inquiry is conditional: when statements under section 108 (Customs) are not admissible under the primary clause, they become relevant only if the declarants are examined as witnesses before the adjudicating authority, the authority forms an opinion to admit them, and cross examination is afforded; these procedural safeguards in section 138B(1)(b) (and counterpart section 9D(1)(b) in Central Excise) are mandatory. Failure to comply bars reliance on such statements; accordingly, a penalty imposed solely on an unvalidated section 108 statement was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.