Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
