Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Retrospective cancellation of registration was found invalid because the Show Cause Notice lacked reasons supporting retrospective action and the petitioner was not placed on prior notice; that defect rendered the impugned order void. The review petition sought to reopen arguments already concluded in adjudication, but review jurisdiction cannot serve as an original hearing; therefore reopening overruled contentions was impermissible. The court found no manifest or material error on the face of the record amounting to a miscarriage of justice and accordingly dismissed the review petition.
Retrospective cancellation of registration was found invalid because the Show Cause Notice lacked reasons supporting retrospective action and the petitioner was not placed on prior notice; that defect rendered the impugned order void. The review petition sought to reopen arguments already concluded in adjudication, but review jurisdiction cannot serve as an original hearing; therefore reopening overruled contentions was impermissible. The court found no manifest or material error on the face of the record amounting to a miscarriage of justice and accordingly dismissed the review petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
