<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retrospective registration cancellation challenged for lack of reasons and prior notice, review petition dismissed as not maintainable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96716</link>
    <description>Retrospective cancellation of registration was found invalid because the Show Cause Notice lacked reasons supporting retrospective action and the petitioner was not placed on prior notice; that defect rendered the impugned order void. The review petition sought to reopen arguments already concluded in adjudication, but review jurisdiction cannot serve as an original hearing; therefore reopening overruled contentions was impermissible. The court found no manifest or material error on the face of the record amounting to a miscarriage of justice and accordingly dismissed the review petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retrospective registration cancellation challenged for lack of reasons and prior notice, review petition dismissed as not maintainable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96716</link>
      <description>Retrospective cancellation of registration was found invalid because the Show Cause Notice lacked reasons supporting retrospective action and the petitioner was not placed on prior notice; that defect rendered the impugned order void. The review petition sought to reopen arguments already concluded in adjudication, but review jurisdiction cannot serve as an original hearing; therefore reopening overruled contentions was impermissible. The court found no manifest or material error on the face of the record amounting to a miscarriage of justice and accordingly dismissed the review petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>