Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Road-restoration charges form taxable consideration when restoration is requested for a business pipeline project under reverse charge.
    Refund adjustment against disputed penalty demands remains limited during first appeal, requiring reversal of excess recovery.
    Revisional limitation: an unrelated reassessment cannot extend time to revise an unexamined book-profit adjustment thereafter.
    Functional comparability under TNMM excludes software product and intangible-owning companies from software development service provider benchmarking.
    Recovery pending first appeal is capped at the CBDT stay threshold; excess refund adjustment requires repayment.
    Year-specific reassessment information cannot justify reopening when the underlying land-sale transaction belongs to the succeeding assessment year.
    Income Declaration Scheme eligibility may depend on verifying timely cheque tender and subsequent departmental credit under the applicable circular.
    Sufficient Cause for Delay Requires a Pleaded Explanation; Unexplained Inaction Leaves Revenue Appeal Time-Barred Under Limitation Law
    Angadia cash-transit receipts are taxable only to the extent of embedded commission, rather than as unexplained principal funds.
    Reassessment on Borrowed Satisfaction Fails When Recorded Share Transactions Were Already Examined and Accepted in Scrutiny
    Leasehold land rights under Section 56(2)(x): purchase excluded from income-tax additions on the facts presented.
    Revision jurisdiction cannot create a fresh foundation for independent cash-transaction penalty proceedings after a completed assessment.
    Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
    Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
    Final assessment limitation follows DRP-specific timelines when the draft order is timely, despite expiry of general assessment limits.
    Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
    Accommodation-entry loan additions require evidence beyond generic third-party allegations, while interest disallowance needs proof of actual incurren...
    Comparable uncontrolled price method requires actual uncontrolled transactions, resulting in deletion of unsupported related-party loan interest adjus...
    Limitation for section 271D penalties requires a timely order, making orders beyond the statutory period invalid.
    Service of reassessment notice remains a jurisdictional precondition; participation after inquiry notice cannot cure non-service.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Addition under Section 68 alleging unexplained share capital and...

Unexplained share capital under Section 68: traceable investors and bank evidence upheld, Tribunal findings favoured the assessee.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax February 6, 2026 Case Laws HC
Addition under Section 68 alleging unexplained share capital and share premium was contested on grounds of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of subscribers; court accepted traceability via bank records and Section 133(6) responses, finding subscribers to be taxpayers and creditworthy, and therefore rejected characterization as phantom investors. The prospective proviso to Section 68 (Finance Act, 2012) was held inapplicable for the relevant assessment year, so the "source of source" and "origin of origin" doctrines were not applied. Allegations of money laundering or roundtripping lacked specific corroborative evidence showing a live link to the assessee; Tribunal findings for the assessee were upheld.

Topics

Acts Income Tax