Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Addition under Section 68 alleging unexplained share capital and share premium was contested on grounds of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of subscribers; court accepted traceability via bank records and Section 133(6) responses, finding subscribers to be taxpayers and creditworthy, and therefore rejected characterization as phantom investors. The prospective proviso to Section 68 (Finance Act, 2012) was held inapplicable for the relevant assessment year, so the 'source of source' and 'origin of origin' doctrines were not applied. Allegations of money laundering or roundtripping lacked specific corroborative evidence showing a live link to the assessee; Tribunal findings for the assessee were upheld.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
