Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
