Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
