Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Protective assessment cannot co-exist where substantive additions on the same income are sustained in the hands of the correct assessee; the tribunal found the assessing officer had identified and made substantive additions in the partners' hands which were affirmed on appeal, and therefore the protective addition against the partnership firm must be deleted because permitting both would tax the same income twice. The protective assessment is a temporary revenue-protection measure and loses relevance once the real assessee is determined and income is substantively assessed in that persons hands. The appeal was allowed and the protective addition deleted.
Protective assessment cannot co-exist where substantive additions on the same income are sustained in the hands of the correct assessee; the tribunal found the assessing officer had identified and made substantive additions in the partners' hands which were affirmed on appeal, and therefore the protective addition against the partnership firm must be deleted because permitting both would tax the same income twice. The protective assessment is a temporary revenue-protection measure and loses relevance once the real assessee is determined and income is substantively assessed in that persons hands. The appeal was allowed and the protective addition deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
