PMLA liability is contingent on a subsisting scheduled...
Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prosecution.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
PMLA liability is contingent on a subsisting scheduled (predicate) offence and identifiable proceeds of crime; absent generation of proceeds, layering or siphoning cannot be established and prosecution under sections 3 read with 4 cannot be sustained. Appellate orders setting aside provisional and confirmed attachments, together with final discharge of accused in the predicate offences, remove the legal basis for continuing money-laundering proceedings and the associated property attachments; those applicants who sought discharge should be released from the money-laundering charge. Proceedings remain undetermined only for accused who have not secured discharge or whose challenges are pending.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.