Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
