Penalty under the penal provision cannot be imposed where income...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without concealment set aside
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty under the penal provision cannot be imposed where income or expenditure is determined purely by estimation; consequently, imposition of penalty for estimation-based determination is not justified. Disallowance arising from failure to deduct or pay tax at source is not, by itself, attractable to penalty under the penal provision when derived under the deduction provision, and thus no penalty follows on such disallowance. Additions characterized as arising from sundry creditors or debtors were treated as additions under deemed income provisions, but where underlying information was already on record and did not amount to concealment or inaccurate particulars, such additions cannot be equated with concealment and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.