Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The sole issue is tariff classification under Heading 9021: whether the Onyx embolization system is an 'artificial part of the body' (CTI 9021 31/39) or an implanted appliance compensating for a defect (CTI 9021 90 90). Applying GRI 1 and Explanatory Notes, the authority finds classification turns on anatomical replacement: artificial parts must substitute or replicate body structure. The Onyx system occludes vascular defects to induce thrombosis and does not replace or restore anatomical structure; therefore it is not classifiable under 9021 31/39 and is held classifiable under CTI 9021 90 90. - AAR
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
