Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Electronic records and proforma invoices recovered from appellants' devices satisfy FEMA Section 39(i)-(b) requirements because they were seized under the Customs Act, used in FEMA adjudication, and corroborated by intercepted consignments and admissions - evidence admissible and relied upon (outcome: documents admitted). Payments routed overseas via Hawala and admissions of mis-declaration establish contravention of FEMA Section 3(b) for unlawful outward remittances (outcome: penalty sustained for Hawala payments). Three directors were held liable under Section 42 as de facto controllers of the proprietorship (outcome: directors penalised). Penalty quantum was reduced on grounds of prior payment of differential duty with interest and financial hardship (outcome: reduced penalties). - AT
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
