Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer's salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer's non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer's salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer's non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.