<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Salary TDS deducted but not deposited by employer, missing from Form 26AS; tax demand recovery shifted to employer</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95813</link>
    <description>Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer&#039;s salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer&#039;s non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:15:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Salary TDS deducted but not deposited by employer, missing from Form 26AS; tax demand recovery shifted to employer</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95813</link>
      <description>Where TDS was deducted from the taxpayer&#039;s salary as evidenced by the TDS certificate but did not reflect in Form 26AS due to the employer&#039;s non-deposit, the taxpayer could not be treated as in default or made to bear the tax demand. Once salary is paid after deduction, the statutory obligation to deposit the deducted TDS lies solely on the employer as the tax-collecting agent under Chapter XVII, and the taxpayer has no control over subsequent remittance. Accordingly, the assessing officer was directed not to recover the demand from the taxpayer and to pursue recovery or other remedial action against the employer; the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:15:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>