Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Approval of a corporate debtor's resolution plan was held not to ipso facto discharge a third-party security provider/surety from contractual liability. The plan expressly preserved financial creditors' rights against third parties, including existing promoters/security providers, in respect of the "unsustainable debt," while stipulating that any claim by such third parties against the corporate debtor or resolution applicant arising from invocation/enforcement of the security would be settled at NIL value. On this construction, the plan did not extinguish the entire debt so as to bar creditor claims against the third-party security provider. The appeal was dismissed. - SC
Approval of a corporate debtor's resolution plan was held not to ipso facto discharge a third-party security provider/surety from contractual liability. The plan expressly preserved financial creditors' rights against third parties, including existing promoters/security providers, in respect of the "unsustainable debt," while stipulating that any claim by such third parties against the corporate debtor or resolution applicant arising from invocation/enforcement of the security would be settled at NIL value. On this construction, the plan did not extinguish the entire debt so as to bar creditor claims against the third-party security provider. The appeal was dismissed. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.