<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate debtor resolution plan and &quot;unsustainable debt&quot;: third-party promoter/surety security liability continues; creditor rights preserved, appeal dismissed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95799</link>
    <description>Approval of a corporate debtor&#039;s resolution plan was held not to ipso facto discharge a third-party security provider/surety from contractual liability. The plan expressly preserved financial creditors&#039; rights against third parties, including existing promoters/security providers, in respect of the &quot;unsustainable debt,&quot; while stipulating that any claim by such third parties against the corporate debtor or resolution applicant arising from invocation/enforcement of the security would be settled at NIL value. On this construction, the plan did not extinguish the entire debt so as to bar creditor claims against the third-party security provider. The appeal was dismissed. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:27:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate debtor resolution plan and &quot;unsustainable debt&quot;: third-party promoter/surety security liability continues; creditor rights preserved, appeal dismissed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95799</link>
      <description>Approval of a corporate debtor&#039;s resolution plan was held not to ipso facto discharge a third-party security provider/surety from contractual liability. The plan expressly preserved financial creditors&#039; rights against third parties, including existing promoters/security providers, in respect of the &quot;unsustainable debt,&quot; while stipulating that any claim by such third parties against the corporate debtor or resolution applicant arising from invocation/enforcement of the security would be settled at NIL value. On this construction, the plan did not extinguish the entire debt so as to bar creditor claims against the third-party security provider. The appeal was dismissed. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:27:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>