Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of accumulated unutilized ITC on export of services was rejected by treating the petitioner's zero-rated supplies under s.16 IGST Act as "intermediary services." On construing the service agreement with the foreign group entity and considering consistent refund sanctions under pre- and post-GST regimes along with binding precedent, the court held the petitioner neither acted as an intermediary nor provided intermediary services. Consequently, the order-in-original and computation sheet were quashed to the extent they denied refund on the intermediary ground, and the petition was allowed. - HC
Refund of accumulated unutilized ITC on export of services was rejected by treating the petitioner's zero-rated supplies under s.16 IGST Act as "intermediary services." On construing the service agreement with the foreign group entity and considering consistent refund sanctions under pre- and post-GST regimes along with binding precedent, the court held the petitioner neither acted as an intermediary nor provided intermediary services. Consequently, the order-in-original and computation sheet were quashed to the extent they denied refund on the intermediary ground, and the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
