<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exported group support services and accumulated ITC refund dispute: &quot;intermediary services&quot; label rejected; refund denial quashed u/s16</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95651</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated unutilized ITC on export of services was rejected by treating the petitioner&#039;s zero-rated supplies under s.16 IGST Act as &quot;intermediary services.&quot; On construing the service agreement with the foreign group entity and considering consistent refund sanctions under pre- and post-GST regimes along with binding precedent, the court held the petitioner neither acted as an intermediary nor provided intermediary services. Consequently, the order-in-original and computation sheet were quashed to the extent they denied refund on the intermediary ground, and the petition was allowed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exported group support services and accumulated ITC refund dispute: &quot;intermediary services&quot; label rejected; refund denial quashed u/s16</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95651</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated unutilized ITC on export of services was rejected by treating the petitioner&#039;s zero-rated supplies under s.16 IGST Act as &quot;intermediary services.&quot; On construing the service agreement with the foreign group entity and considering consistent refund sanctions under pre- and post-GST regimes along with binding precedent, the court held the petitioner neither acted as an intermediary nor provided intermediary services. Consequently, the order-in-original and computation sheet were quashed to the extent they denied refund on the intermediary ground, and the petition was allowed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>