Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Classification turned on whether an imported embolization coil is an 'artificial part of the body' under CTI 9021 39 00 or an 'other appliance, implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability' under CTI 9021 90 90. The authority held that the coil is implanted and therapeutically compensates for vascular defects by producing controlled occlusion, but it does not replace or anatomically substitute a defective body part, which is the primary criterion for coverage as an artificial body part under the preceding CTI 9021 10 to 39 entries. Foreign rulings were found non-persuasive given differences at the Indian eight-digit level and dissimilar device function. Accordingly, the product was classified under CTI 9021 90 90. - AAR
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
