Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Challenge to adjudication denying zero-rated turnover for FY 2019-20 turned on whether the proceedings were time-barred in light of multiple GST notifications extending limitation, whose validity is pending before the apex court and could materially affect the assessment. To avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of litigation, the adjudication order was set aside and the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a de novo order in accordance with law, after granting a further opportunity. Relief was made conditional on payment of costs to the legal services authority within six weeks. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
