Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Issue was whether an importer classified as a small enterprise could claim the benefit of the amended regulatory order extending permission to sell/display/offer declared stock up to 31.12.2025. The court held that the later amendment expressly added 'importer' and the schedules were unchanged; since the petitioner's status as importer and MSME registration were undisputed, the extended deadline applied, entitling sale up to 31.12.2025. A further issue was release of imported goods despite pending tribunal proceedings; since CESTAT had kept the order-in-original in abeyance, its quasi-judicial order had to be given effect and the goods were directed to be released, conditional on deposit of Rs. 15,00,000 within 24 hours, failing which relief would lapse - HC
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
