Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The dominant issue was whether the attached properties...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal dismissed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The dominant issue was whether the attached properties constituted "proceeds of crime" under anti-money laundering law warranting confirmation of attachment. The record showed deliberate laundering through colorable explanations of income and consideration, admissions of attempting to regularize transactions via false and fabricated loan agreements, and use of a benami-like family arrangement coupled with appointment of an attorney to acquire properties, supported by statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC. Since the adjudicating authority and tribunal had rendered concurrent, detailed factual findings on these materials, no error of law or ground for interference was made out, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the attachment. - HC
The dominant issue was whether the attached properties constituted "proceeds of crime" under anti-money laundering law warranting confirmation of attachment. The record showed deliberate laundering through colorable explanations of income and consideration, admissions of attempting to regularize transactions via false and fabricated loan agreements, and use of a benami-like family arrangement coupled with appointment of an attorney to acquire properties, supported by statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC. Since the adjudicating authority and tribunal had rendered concurrent, detailed factual findings on these materials, no error of law or ground for interference was made out, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the attachment. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
