Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
For payments of capital gains to non-resident shareholders on transfer of shares of an Indian unlisted company, the dominant issue was whether TDS at 11.54% was correctly applied by adopting the concessional rate under s.112(1)(c)(iii) rather than applying indexation/other adjustments under the provisos to s.48 to deny such rate. The Tribunal held that the s.48 provisos govern the mode of computation (including foreign currency conversion) and do not displace the concessional rate prescribed under s.112(1)(c)(iii) for the relevant period; the AO had ignored the statutory conditions. The direction to verify remittances and apply 11.54% TDS was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
For payments of capital gains to non-resident shareholders on transfer of shares of an Indian unlisted company, the dominant issue was whether TDS at 11.54% was correctly applied by adopting the concessional rate under s.112(1)(c)(iii) rather than applying indexation/other adjustments under the provisos to s.48 to deny such rate. The Tribunal held that the s.48 provisos govern the mode of computation (including foreign currency conversion) and do not displace the concessional rate prescribed under s.112(1)(c)(iii) for the relevant period; the AO had ignored the statutory conditions. The direction to verify remittances and apply 11.54% TDS was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
