PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Marker testing and double haploid services were examined under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA to determine if receipts constituted royalty. Since the services did not merely generate reports but converted seeds into double haploid plants and supplied enhanced seeds for commercial exploitation, the process involved technology and scientific experience whose information was passed on to the Indian affiliate, satisfying the treaty's royalty definition; the challenge to royalty characterization was rejected. Separately, amounts recovered on a cost-to-cost basis for routine third-party IT support were treated as reimbursements, and no technical knowledge or process was "made available"; the receipts were held not taxable as FTS under section 9(1)(vii). - ITAT
Marker testing and double haploid services were examined under Article 12(4) of the India-Netherlands DTAA to determine if receipts constituted royalty. Since the services did not merely generate reports but converted seeds into double haploid plants and supplied enhanced seeds for commercial exploitation, the process involved technology and scientific experience whose information was passed on to the Indian affiliate, satisfying the treaty's royalty definition; the challenge to royalty characterization was rejected. Separately, amounts recovered on a cost-to-cost basis for routine third-party IT support were treated as reimbursements, and no technical knowledge or process was "made available"; the receipts were held not taxable as FTS under section 9(1)(vii). - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.