Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
