Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
