Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The dominant issue was whether an assessee is entitled to interest for a substantial delay in receiving a refund granted under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and whether "interest on interest" is payable. Relying on binding precedent recognising compensation for delayed refunds and permitting interest on the interest component where refund is unlawfully withheld, the Court held that the revenue could not deny statutory/compensatory interest merely because the refund had been sanctioned but not paid. Consequently, a writ of mandamus was issued directing payment of interest at 6% p.a. on the delayed refund from 25-05-2021 till 10-01-2024, along with interest on such interest. - HC
The dominant issue was whether an assessee is entitled to interest for a substantial delay in receiving a refund granted under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and whether "interest on interest" is payable. Relying on binding precedent recognising compensation for delayed refunds and permitting interest on the interest component where refund is unlawfully withheld, the Court held that the revenue could not deny statutory/compensatory interest merely because the refund had been sanctioned but not paid. Consequently, a writ of mandamus was issued directing payment of interest at 6% p.a. on the delayed refund from 25-05-2021 till 10-01-2024, along with interest on such interest. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
