PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether the assessee-trust's vocational training and skill development programmes for underprivileged persons, conducted for fees and generating surplus, constituted "education" under s. 2(15) so as to qualify for exemption u/s 11, was answered in the affirmative. Applying the test that "education" involves a formal and systematic process of instruction or training, the trust's structured vocational courses, including later affiliation with a university for a post-graduate programme, were held to fall within "education" rather than "advancement of general public utility"; hence the proviso to s. 2(15) was not attracted. Mere surplus generation was held insufficient to deny exemption where audit material showed the surplus was ploughed back for educational objects and not diverted. Exemption was allowed and the denial by the authorities was set aside - HC
Whether the assessee-trust's vocational training and skill development programmes for underprivileged persons, conducted for fees and generating surplus, constituted "education" under s. 2(15) so as to qualify for exemption u/s 11, was answered in the affirmative. Applying the test that "education" involves a formal and systematic process of instruction or training, the trust's structured vocational courses, including later affiliation with a university for a post-graduate programme, were held to fall within "education" rather than "advancement of general public utility"; hence the proviso to s. 2(15) was not attracted. Mere surplus generation was held insufficient to deny exemption where audit material showed the surplus was ploughed back for educational objects and not diverted. Exemption was allowed and the denial by the authorities was set aside - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.