Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT
Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.