https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95207 Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:30:26 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:30:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95207 Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT Highlights Income Tax Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:30:26 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95207