Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that, in the peculiar facts, the petitioner had diligently pursued its claim for interest on delayed IGST refund before appellate authorities under the Customs Act, and the jurisdictional objection was raised for the first time in the impugned order. HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal against the common order dated 01.12.2020, limited to the issue of interest on IGST refunds, before the appellate authority under the GST Act within four weeks. HC directed that, if so filed, the appeal be decided on merits in accordance with law, without examining limitation. Appeal disposed.
HC held that, in the peculiar facts, the petitioner had diligently pursued its claim for interest on delayed IGST refund before appellate authorities under the Customs Act, and the jurisdictional objection was raised for the first time in the impugned order. HC permitted the petitioner to file an appeal against the common order dated 01.12.2020, limited to the issue of interest on IGST refunds, before the appellate authority under the GST Act within four weeks. HC directed that, if so filed, the appeal be decided on merits in accordance with law, without examining limitation. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
