PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that N/N 134/94-Cus dated 22.06.1994 and the MOOWR scheme, though both operating under s.65 of the Customs Act, 1962, function in distinct domains and their benefits cannot be simultaneously availed for the same imported second-hand goods. The applicant may, however, claim duty exemption under N/N 134/94-Cus for second-hand goods imported for repair, reconditioning, re-engineering, testing, calibration or maintenance, subject to strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export within three years and prior approval of the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs under s.65. AAR further clarified that valuation and duty treatment of wastage/scrap generated during such operations will be governed by s.65(2), differing based on whether resultant goods are exported or cleared for home consumption.
AAR held that N/N 134/94-Cus dated 22.06.1994 and the MOOWR scheme, though both operating under s.65 of the Customs Act, 1962, function in distinct domains and their benefits cannot be simultaneously availed for the same imported second-hand goods. The applicant may, however, claim duty exemption under N/N 134/94-Cus for second-hand goods imported for repair, reconditioning, re-engineering, testing, calibration or maintenance, subject to strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export within three years and prior approval of the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs under s.65. AAR further clarified that valuation and duty treatment of wastage/scrap generated during such operations will be governed by s.65(2), differing based on whether resultant goods are exported or cleared for home consumption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.