Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
HC considered cancellation of petitioner's GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) CGST Act for non-filing of returns for over six months. Referring to Rule 22(4) CGST Rules and its proviso, HC held that where a registered person is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay full tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer is empowered to drop cancellation proceedings and restore registration by order in Form GST REG-20. Recognising the serious civil consequences of cancellation, HC disposed of the writ by directing petitioner to approach the competent authority within two months seeking restoration in accordance with law.
HC considered cancellation of petitioner's GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) CGST Act for non-filing of returns for over six months. Referring to Rule 22(4) CGST Rules and its proviso, HC held that where a registered person is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay full tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer is empowered to drop cancellation proceedings and restore registration by order in Form GST REG-20. Recognising the serious civil consequences of cancellation, HC disposed of the writ by directing petitioner to approach the competent authority within two months seeking restoration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
