Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
HC considered cancellation of petitioner's GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) CGST Act for non-filing of returns for over six months. Referring to Rule 22(4) CGST Rules and its proviso, HC held that where a registered person is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay full tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer is empowered to drop cancellation proceedings and restore registration by order in Form GST REG-20. Recognising the serious civil consequences of cancellation, HC disposed of the writ by directing petitioner to approach the competent authority within two months seeking restoration in accordance with law.
HC considered cancellation of petitioner's GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) CGST Act for non-filing of returns for over six months. Referring to Rule 22(4) CGST Rules and its proviso, HC held that where a registered person is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay full tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer is empowered to drop cancellation proceedings and restore registration by order in Form GST REG-20. Recognising the serious civil consequences of cancellation, HC disposed of the writ by directing petitioner to approach the competent authority within two months seeking restoration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
