Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC construed CBDT circulars dated 09.09.2019 and 23.01.2020 in relation to prosecution under ss. 276C(1) and 278E of the IT Act. It held that where the amount of tax sought to be evaded exceeds Rs. 25 lakhs, the competent approving/sanctioning authority for launching prosecution is the PCIT, and not a collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers. The requirement of collegium approval applies only where the evaded tax is Rs. 25 lakhs or below. Finding the sanction valid and no infirmity in prosecution, the petition by assessee was dismissed.
HC construed CBDT circulars dated 09.09.2019 and 23.01.2020 in relation to prosecution under ss. 276C(1) and 278E of the IT Act. It held that where the amount of tax sought to be evaded exceeds Rs. 25 lakhs, the competent approving/sanctioning authority for launching prosecution is the PCIT, and not a collegium of two CCIT/DGIT rank officers. The requirement of collegium approval applies only where the evaded tax is Rs. 25 lakhs or below. Finding the sanction valid and no infirmity in prosecution, the petition by assessee was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
