Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed the appeal of the manufacturer-exporter under the Target Plus scheme, holding that use of imported inputs under Customs Notification No. 73/2006-Cus through a job worker did not violate condition (3) of the exemption. The Tribunal interpreted "own use" to include manufacture through job-work facilities, relying on a coordinate bench ruling in Silver Line Plastpack and a supporting Public Notice, and noted the absence of any allegation or finding that the goods were sold to the job worker. The impugned demand was set aside, and the duty credit entitlement under the Target Plus scheme was held to be validly availed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal of the manufacturer-exporter under the Target Plus scheme, holding that use of imported inputs under Customs Notification No. 73/2006-Cus through a job worker did not violate condition (3) of the exemption. The Tribunal interpreted "own use" to include manufacture through job-work facilities, relying on a coordinate bench ruling in Silver Line Plastpack and a supporting Public Notice, and noted the absence of any allegation or finding that the goods were sold to the job worker. The impugned demand was set aside, and the duty credit entitlement under the Target Plus scheme was held to be validly availed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
