Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
