Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
