Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging deletion of additions on account of alleged bogus purchases of raw boneless meat and round tripping of funds. The assessee demonstrated that its factory premises had been leased to a third-party company, with rent payments and ledger entries substantiating that no manufacturing or trading activities were carried out by it during the relevant period. The Tribunal held that the AO had proceeded on an incorrect factual premise and that the CIT(A) had correctly appreciated the factual matrix in deleting the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.