Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on cash deposits of specified bank notes during demonetisation. The Tribunal held that the impugned cash deposits represented recorded sales already credited to the Profit & Loss account, duly reflected in audited books and VAT/Sales Tax returns, with no rejection of books or discrepancy in sales, purchases or stock by the AO. Since the sales were accepted as genuine and payments for purchases were routed through banking channels, invoking s.68 would result in impermissible double addition. The order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on cash deposits of specified bank notes during demonetisation. The Tribunal held that the impugned cash deposits represented recorded sales already credited to the Profit & Loss account, duly reflected in audited books and VAT/Sales Tax returns, with no rejection of books or discrepancy in sales, purchases or stock by the AO. Since the sales were accepted as genuine and payments for purchases were routed through banking channels, invoking s.68 would result in impermissible double addition. The order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
