Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C in respect of alleged furniture expenses incurred by the assessee's spouse. The Tribunal noted that, as per the capital account and balance sheet as on 31.03.2017, the spouse possessed sufficient funds to meet the furniture expenditure of Rs. 17,50,000/-. In the absence of any rebuttal or contrary material from the Revenue, the explanation could not be discarded. The addition was held to be arbitrary, misconceived and unsustainable in law.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C in respect of alleged furniture expenses incurred by the assessee's spouse. The Tribunal noted that, as per the capital account and balance sheet as on 31.03.2017, the spouse possessed sufficient funds to meet the furniture expenditure of Rs. 17,50,000/-. In the absence of any rebuttal or contrary material from the Revenue, the explanation could not be discarded. The addition was held to be arbitrary, misconceived and unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
